Many regions in the world are grappling with water scarcity. Numerous efforts to desalinate and trade in water are evidence of the magnitude of the problem. The World Bank puts the number of people living with absolute water scarcity at 2bn, a number that could hit the 4.6bn mark within the next 65 years. The water energy nexus has been a regular subject in recent years. Power plants that feed most nations consume a lot of water, either directly or indirectly. When it comes to the feasibility study of a cooling plant, the debate of consuming water or not is very important. Depending on the results of this study, water-cooled or air-cooled chillers will be selected.
What is a chiller?
This device removes heat from a load and transfers it to the environment using a refrigeration system. This heat transfer device is the preferable cooling machine in power plants and other large-scale facilities. It is simply a system consisting of ethylene + water or water reservoir and circulation components. The cooling fluid is circulated from the reservoir to the equipment undercooling. There are also air-cooled chillers, which disperse heat-using fans. These are more recent and common in power plants. In this post, we review the difference between the two technologies, leaving the choice of which one to pick to you. ARANER would be happy to help you in the decision making process.
Water-Cooled Chiller
Water cooled chiller systems have a cooling tower, thus they feature higher efficiency than air-cooled chillers. Water cooled chiller is more efficient because it condense depending on the ambient temperature bulb temperature, which is lower than the ambient dry bulb temperature. The lower a chiller condenses, the more efficient it is. This system has several essential components including:
- Cooling towers
- Condenser water pumps
- Make-up water pumps
- Chillers
- TES reservoirs
What are the benefits of a water-cooled chiller? Some users may prefer these chillers because of the smaller size they occupy as compared to air-cooled chillers. These chillers also feature higher efficiency and last longer than the mentioned alternative. Those who would like the equipment to be placed indoors may find the water-cooled machine desirable.
Discover: Chilled Water System on your next project: save up to 40% of energy
In The Evaporator
The role of the evaporator is to produce chilled water. The device releases the water at about 6°C (42.8°F) and pushes it throughout the facility with the help of a pump. A network of pipes passes the chilled water through every necessary section of the building. After exchanging coldness with room air, which blows across the Air Handling Units (AHU’s) and fan coil units (FCU’s), the water is now warmer at about 12°C (53.6°F). It returns to the evaporator where the refrigerant absorbs the unwanted heat and directs it to the condenser. The chilled water is cool once again and it can now continue to cool the facility. Note how this is called “chilled water” throughout no matter the temperature.
In The Condenser
A refrigerant brings unwanted heat from the evaporator and passes through the condenser. There is another loop connected to the condenser- the condenser water loop, which is between the cooling tower and the condenser. After entering the condenser at about 27°C (80.6°F), the water leaves at 32°C (89.6°F) and heads to the cooling tower. Note that at no time do the refrigerant and the condenser contact directly. Heat exchange is only through a pipe wall. The condenser water, with the unwanted heat, goes to the cooling tower for further heat rejection.
In The Cooling Towers
This is where the unwanted heat in a facility ends up. A large fan feeds the unit with air. The air meets with the oncoming condenser water. From the direct contact, the condenser water loses heat to the air. The condenser water goes back to the condenser the cycle continues. These open-topped devices come in many designs depending on many factors. Examples are cross flow, counter flow, natural draft and mechanical draft. Stay with us for coverage of these designs in upcoming posts. This is a good way of settling the cooling tower vs. chiller confusion. However, if you still need more details about the water-cooled chiller components and operation, reach out to our team and you will get help. Now, compare it to the air-cooled chiller discussed below.
Air-Cooled Chiller
Where aesthetics and environmental conditions or water access restrictions exist, the air-cooled chiller may be applied. Both air-cooled chiller and water cooled chiller depend on an air stream as a means of heat transfer. The difference is that the water-cooled chillers or rather the cooling towers use a humid air stream (ambient air stream + water spray) while the air-cooled chillers use a current of ambient air. Normally water-cooled chiller is cheaper and more efficient, with the disadvantage of high water consumption. ARANER has found a way of combining modern manufacturing methods and advanced technology to achieve highly effective and efficient air-cooled chillers. Owing to that, the company’s chiller plants are very competitive to water chilled chillers in different aspects. For example, these plants are very impressive in terms of footprint, efficiency, and noise. Unfortunately, some people still believe that air-cooled chillers cannot offer quite good efficiencies. What such people only need to check is the performance of these chillers two decades ago is the progressive increase in NPLV rating of air-cooled chillers over the years. Already, many chiller plants in the Middle East and elsewhere have adopted ARANER’s air-cooled designs and have expressed satisfaction. When used in part-load applications, these chillers are very reliable. In summary, here are the benefits of using air-cooled chillers:
- No cooling towers
- Better environmental stability-no water wastage
- Low maintenance costs
- Easier to operate and control-tower freezing and tower bypass absent
- Chemical costs avoided
- Water costs avoided, especially in cities
- No water problems to deal with in case of disaster
Fig 1: Air-Cooled Chilled Alongside Water Cooled (Traditional) Chiller
How do I choose between the two?
The cooling capacity is the main guideline for the choice of the chiller. Equally crucial is the balance between operating costs and capital costs. Some clients will base their buying decision on initial costs. However, a value-based option considers both operational cost and initial cost. To determine the initial cost of each option, add the costs for both contractors and equipment. For the water-cooled chiller, remember to add cooling tower. When it comes to life cycle cost, you have to consider both purchase cost and operating cost. When you evaluate each of the two chillers this way, you are able to determine its total cost. What you must note is that water-cooled chillers normally appear more valuable if you ignore first cost and water cost. However, it is only after you look at the broader costs that the true picture appears clearly.
Other alternatives: hybrid chillers
Hybrid chillers are chillers that can operate as air-cooled chillers under certain conditions and water-cooled chillers under other conditions. They are an interesting alternative for areas with a predominantly dry climate and low water availability. Also, when water availability is not constant or reliable.
It might interest you: Environmental Consideration of Chillers for District Cooling Plants
Water-cooled chiller and air-cooled chiller, the main advantages!
Energy cost remains a major consideration in any powered equipment. Energy-saving measures are being implemented everywhere. While the chiller has direct impact on energy usage, there are other factors to consider. While the water-cooled chiller may be more energy-efficient, it receives stiff competition from air-cooled chiller in terms of installation cost, maintenance cost, number of equipment, and several other aspects. Most importantly, air-cooled chillers avoid water consumption so they are the ideal alternatives in areas with water scarcity or areas with cheap energy but costly water fees. Have you made your choice already? Give us a call today for the most specialized and customized attention. If you enjoyed this post, you maybe want to know different heat rejection condensing technologies.
When seeking to cool a large scale commercial or industrial facility, insufficient information often leads to an unsatisfactory solution. While some stakeholders choose water-cooled chillers because they believe the cooling tower in these systems offers more efficiency, others prefer air-based cooling systems because of the less prohibitive upfront price. And with recent technological advances made in both air and water-based chilling systems, determining which option is the right fit has become even more challenging. To decide which system best suits a specific project’s needs, it’s important to understand the pros and cons associated with each option.
Same Basic System
Water-cooled chillers and air-based cooling systems both contain an evaporator, condenser, compressor and expansion valve. Liquid refrigerant flows over the evaporator tube bundle and evaporates, absorbing heat from the chilled water circulating through the bundle. The compressor draws the refrigerant vapor out of the evaporator, then pumps it to the condenser, raising its pressure and temperature. As the refrigerant condenses on or in the condenser tubes, its heat is emitted to the cooling water or air. At this point, the high-pressure liquid refrigerant passes from the condenser through the expansion device, reducing the pressure and temperature as it enters the evaporator, then flows over the chilled coils absorbing more heat and completing the cycle. The difference between air and water-based systems begins at the condensing stage.
Key Differences
A water-based cooling system requires cooling towers, condenser water pumps, reservoirs of cooling fluid, and make-up pumps. While upfront costs for a water-cooled chiller are typically higher, these systems often last longer than air-based coolers, resulting in a lower life-cycle cost, thereby offering increased ROI. The use of water rather than air also translates to a smaller footprint, requiring less space comparatively. However, if access to clean and plentiful water is limited, the water-cooling method becomes too expensive and quite challenging to maintain.
On the other hand, air-based systems use fans to create a moving current of air, requiring no cooling towers or water to operate. This option may preferable for poor quality makeup water or in areas with higher than normal water costs. However, to remove unwanted heat from structures, these systems need access to a lot of fresh air, resulting in more space required to house them.
The Right Option Versus the Right Cost
So what’s the simplest way to determine the best option for a project? It comes down to comparing accessibility and usage with life cycle versus initial cost. If water is in good supply and accessible, and budgets permit a higher initial purchase, efficient, longer-lasting water-based systems provide a lower cost of ownership. If a consistent water supply is unavailable or the initial cost of a water-cooled system seems prohibitive, with less equipment and maintenance required, an air-cooled system may be the better option.
When a water-based cooling system is the right fit, Chem-Aqua has solutions that can reduce associated costs. Chem-Aqua provides custom water treatment solutions to minimize energy, water, and maintenance costs, ensuring critical water-based cooling systems run reliably, efficiently, and safely. To learn how Chem-Aqua can help bring water cooling costs down, contact us today!