Should I do a CT scan and if so, how often?
If you've ever been advised to get a CT scan, you might wonder how often you should have one. As someone who works closely with cardiology patients, I understand the concerns about balancing the benefits of this powerful diagnostic tool with the need to limit exposure to medical imaging. CT scans can provide invaluable insights into heart health, but it&#;s essential to know when they&#;re necessary and how often you might need one. Let&#;s break down some of the key factors. For some feedback from some of our patients on their experiences with CT scans with us, view here.
What Is a CT Scan, and How Does It Work?
A CT (computed tomography) scan is an advanced imaging technique that creates detailed cross-sectional images of the body. When it comes to heart health, the CT coronary angiogram is particularly useful. This scan highlights the coronary arteries, allowing us to assess any narrowing or blockages. It&#;s a non-invasive way to get a clearer view of the blood vessels supplying your heart, often used to diagnose or rule out coronary artery disease.
The scan itself uses X-rays and a computer to create detailed images, giving doctors a comprehensive look inside the body without the need for invasive procedures. For people at risk of heart disease, a CT scan can be a crucial tool, but it&#;s also a test that shouldn&#;t be done too frequently.
How Often Should You Have a CT Scan?
The frequency of CT scans depends on your individual health needs. Generally, CT scans are only recommended when there&#;s a specific medical need&#;such as diagnosing a condition, evaluating the effectiveness of a treatment, or monitoring the progression of a disease. Unlike routine blood tests or check-ups, CT scans aren&#;t typically part of regular health screenings.
For heart health, you may only need a CT coronary angiogram once if your cardiologist suspects you have coronary artery disease or if you&#;re experiencing specific symptoms, like chest pain or shortness of breath. If the initial scan shows no significant issues, you may not need another scan for several years, if at all. However, if you have ongoing symptoms or a high risk of heart disease, your cardiologist may recommend follow-up scans at intervals suited to your condition.
Factors That Influence How Often You Need a CT Scan
Several factors play a role in determining how often you might need a CT scan. Here&#;s what to consider:
1. Your Risk Level for Heart Disease
If you&#;re at high risk for heart disease&#;due to factors like family history, high cholesterol, high blood pressure, or lifestyle factors&#;your cardiologist may be more likely to recommend a CT coronary angiogram as part of your evaluation. This scan can help assess the current state of your coronary arteries and detect any early signs of narrowing or blockages.
For those with low or moderate risk, a CT scan may not be necessary unless symptoms arise. Regular check-ups and non-invasive tests, like blood pressure and cholesterol monitoring, are often sufficient for those with lower risk.
2. Symptoms or Changes in Health
If you experience new or worsening symptoms such as chest pain, shortness of breath, or unexplained fatigue, a CT scan might be recommended to get a clear view of what&#;s going on with your heart. These symptoms can sometimes indicate issues like coronary artery disease, which a CT coronary angiogram can help diagnose.
In the absence of symptoms, it&#;s generally unnecessary to repeat a CT scan. However, if symptoms develop after a previous clear scan, it might be time for another look.
3. Previous CT Scan Results
If a previous CT scan revealed mild or moderate narrowing of the coronary arteries, your cardiologist may suggest follow-up imaging to monitor the progression. This doesn&#;t mean you&#;ll need a scan every year; rather, your doctor might recommend one every few years or as needed, depending on the initial findings and any changes in your health.
On the other hand, if a CT scan shows clear arteries with no sign of disease, the need for repeat imaging is minimal unless new symptoms develop.
Neusoft Product Page
4. Balancing Radiation Exposure
One of the main considerations with CT scans is the exposure to radiation. Although modern CT scans use much lower doses of radiation than they used to, it&#;s still best to limit exposure when possible. This is why CT scans are typically reserved for situations where they provide significant diagnostic value.
For individuals with ongoing heart conditions requiring monitoring, doctors weigh the benefits of repeated scans against the potential risks. If other, non-radiation imaging options are available, such as an echocardiogram or MRI, they may be used in place of CT scans when appropriate. For more information on managing radiation exposure, the NHS has helpful resources about the benefits and risks of CT scans.
Are There Alternatives to a CT Scan?
For some heart conditions, there are alternative imaging methods that don&#;t involve radiation. An echocardiogram (ultrasound of the heart) can provide detailed images of the heart&#;s structure and function and is often used to assess issues like heart valve disease or heart muscle function. MRI is another option, particularly useful for complex cases, as it provides high-resolution images without radiation exposure.
Your doctor will consider these alternatives when appropriate, especially if regular monitoring is required. However, for assessing coronary arteries, a CT coronary angiogram remains one of the best options.
When Should I Talk to My Doctor About a CT Scan?
If you&#;re concerned about heart disease or are experiencing symptoms like chest pain, shortness of breath, or unusual fatigue, it&#;s essential to speak with your doctor. They&#;ll assess your risk factors and may suggest a CT coronary angiogram if they believe it could provide helpful insights into your heart health.
For those with known heart conditions, your doctor will guide you on the frequency of any follow-up scans. They&#;ll consider your overall risk, previous scan results, and current health status to make the best recommendation for your situation.
Conclusion
While CT scans are powerful diagnostic tools, they&#;re not something most people need on a regular basis. The frequency of CT scans should be based on individual health needs, risk factors, and any changes in symptoms. For many people, a single scan may be sufficient, while others may need periodic follow-ups based on their heart health.
If you have questions about whether a CT scan is right for you or need guidance on managing your heart health, don&#;t hesitate to contact us here for personalised advice.
For more information on heart health, check out these resources:
Less frequent CT scans may reduce health-care costs, patient anxiety
Tim Parker
A new study by researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis found that undergoing more frequent computed tomography (CT) scans was not associated with improved outcomes following lung cancer surgery. Shown is the study&#;s senior author, Varun Puri, MD, a thoracic surgeon and professor of surgery at the School of Medicine, during a surgery.
Regular postsurgical screening is critical for patients with lung cancer, the United States&#; second most prevalent type of cancer and leading cause of cancer deaths. In cases involving early-stage non small cell lung cancer, up to half of patients will experience recurrence within the first two years after surgery.
For these reasons, guidelines by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and other cancer groups recommend computed tomography (CT) scans every three to six months for patients who have had malignant lung tumors surgically removed. However, a new study by researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis found no improvements in survival or recurrence rates among patients who followed the protocol, compared with those who were scanned every six months to one year.
&#;Our findings suggest that lung cancer treatment guidelines should consider less frequent surveillance imaging than current recommendations,&#; said the study&#;s senior author, Varun Puri, MD, a thoracic surgeon and professor of surgery. &#;Annual surveillance would simplify guidelines and may result in better, easier postoperative care for early-stage patients.&#;
The study is published Nov. 28 in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
Non-small cell lung cancer accounts for 84% of all lung cancer cases, according to the American Cancer Society, and the overall five-year survival rate is 25%.
The researchers focused on the first two years after surgery since that is when the risk of lung cancer recurrence is highest. After two to three years, cancer organizations typically recommend annual scans until the end of life.
&#;Scanning too frequently can be associated with unnecessary anxiety for patients and increased health-care costs,&#; said Puri, also a research member of Siteman Cancer Center at Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital. &#;Patients who receive scans to check for recurrent cancer are understandably anxious, especially since it can take several days for results to be received. This phenomenon is sometimes called &#;scanxiety.&#; It is obviously important to minimize scanxiety when it can be done safely.&#;
For the study, the researchers analyzed de-identified medical records in a database maintained by the U.S. Veterans Health Administration, the nation&#;s largest integrated health-care delivery system. The researchers examined information involving 6,171 patients with stage 1 non-small cell lung cancer who underwent surgery from Oct. 1, , through Sept. 31, . One patient group received scans every three to six months, and the other group every six to 12 months.
In all cases, more scans did not offer improved health, including among different tumor sizes, tumor stages and types of surgical procedures. Recurrence was observed in 22% of patients and did not differ based on the frequency of scanning. Similarly, overall survival remained the same between the two groups, with about 65% of patients surviving at least five years.
The average age of the patients was 67.5. The patients were predominantly male and white; however, statistical modeling controlled for different ages, genders and races.
&#;We found that certain patients had received more frequent CT scans, including patients who smoked and patients who had certain types of operations,&#; said the study&#;s first author, Brendan Heiden, MD, a surgical resident and research fellow at Washington University. &#;Conversely, we found that African-American patients received less frequent scans, which is a potentially concerning health disparity that warrants further research. Nonetheless, we were encouraged to find that patient outcomes were generally equivalent regardless of scan frequency.&#;
Heiden continued: &#;The VA treats a unique patient population that consists mostly of males with significant smoking histories. Therefore, we believe that our findings are most applicable to veterans with lung cancer. However, prior studies examining non-VA patient populations have found similar results to ours, suggesting that the results may apply more broadly to the general population. More research is needed.&#;
Contact us to discuss your requirements of neusoft computed tomography. Our experienced sales team can help you identify the options that best suit your needs.