Are you searching for a sieve shaker or other particle size equipment and overwhelmed with options and features?
Please visit our website for more information on this topic.
If this sounds like you, we can help. There are a lot of different machines, features, methods, and several companies who all manufacture great particle analysis equipment or shakers.
There are machines that cost over 20,000 dollars and some that cost as little as 1,200 dollars. There are electronic machines and mechanical machines. And we cant forget that there are all kinds of industry standards to follow.
We wrote this article to help you make your decision and buying process a little easier. We hope that after reading this you have a better understanding of what you will be facing when you go to choose equipment that is right for you.
1. Size Range and Material
Its probably no surprise that the first thing we are going to address is the type and size of the particle you are analyzing. While there are tons of machines out there that will work for the same type of particle or size, this is going to be the minimal information that you must have to be able to find what works best.
Size Range
It is important to not just identify the average particle size, but the full range of sizes in the distribution.
Material
It is important to establish the characteristics of the material that you will be sieving. Here are some questions you likely will want to ask yourself when you are looking for a sieve shaker:
Is my material
- Free flowing/dry?
- Water Soluble?
- A fine powder?
- Less or more dense?
Knowing the answer to these questions will help when looking at descriptions of machines or talking to customer service reps about the equipment you are considering.
There are also going to be some immediate distinctions you can make based on this information, as some machines will be ruled out completely depending on your responses to the above questions.
2. Type of Sieve Shaker
There are 4 main types of sieve shakers on the market. We arent going to get into the nitty-gritty of every single machine and model, but we are going to talk a little bit about each type of shaker to help you narrow down which might be right for you.
Regardless of which type of machine you decide to choose, it is important to perform an end of sieving analysis on any new sieve shaker. This test will help you determine the right run time for the method you have chosen. You can read about this process in our latest article all about how to do an end of sieving analysis.
Mechanical Sieve Shakers
These are the most commonly used and popular type of sieve shakers.
These machines use a motor and separate particles with either orbital or circular motions. In a lot of the mechanical sieve shakers, a hammer also taps the top of the sieve stack to help particles find the openings in the sieves. The hammer units are recommended for finer particles.
There are mechanical sieve shakers out there that dont use a hammer, and simply oscillate or vibrate to separate the particles. These will work for larger particles that are free-flowing and that are easily sieved.
These machines have to be mechanically secured because they can move a lot. If they arent bolted to a table or workbench, they can walk themselves off the table - literally.
The W.S. Tyler Ro-Tap falls into this category. It has two motions, both oscillating and tapping from a hammer, hence the name Ro-Tap. These actions combine to help the particles seek the openings in the sieve stack. If you are interested in the Ro-Tap you can learn all about it in our article: What is the Ro-Tap Sieve Shaker?
Electromagnetic/Vibratory Sieve Shakers
Sieve shakers that use electromagnetic energy to agitate the particles are sometimes called vibratory, electronic, or electromagnetic sieve shakers. These types of sieve shakers are newer innovations on the traditional mechanical shaker.
An even, or fluid, bed of the sample is created by a smooth vibration sensation that allows particles to be analyzed. Pause intervals can be set to allow less dense particles to settle through the openings.
There are notable bonuses to using this type of shaker. They are quieter than a tapping or oscillating machine, and they usually offer some more controls and customization of the sieving action.
We have a few models of electromagnetic shakers and you can check them out on our website: Ro-Tap E Sieve Shakers.
Sonic Sieve Shakers
A sonic sieve shaker uses acoustic energy and air to separate particles. A vertical column of air is created to oscillate through a sieve or stack of sieves.
The motion of the air alternately lifts the sample and then assists it through the sieve apertures. These shakers still use sieves, but they are encased in a steel housing, typically with clear doors through which to view the test.
Sonic sifters can separate material as fine as 5um. You can learn more about this device in the following article:
Air Jet Sieve Machine
The Air Jet Sieve Machine is intended for particles that have low density and are very fine such as powders, like flour. Even though flour is technically made up of small grains, it clumps together and needs to be deagglomerated to be measured correctly.
In an air jet sieve machine, a vacuum is used to create a stream of air that disperses the particles on the sieve. The air allows the fine particles to pass through the openings in the mesh and be measured accordingly.
For more info on the air jet sieve and how it works, you can go to Hosokawa's website and check it out.
3. Budget
It is no surprise that budget made this list. We include this because it might surprise you to learn that you can get particle analysis equipment for as little as 50 dollars or you can pay all the way up to over 50,000 dollars.
Now, there are a lot of differences between those machines and methods, but they are out there. While it is important to work through the other considerations we have listed, your budget is still an important one.
If you find you are at the lower end of the budget, there are still going to be many options in that range you will be able to choose from.
The cheapest method of sieving is to sieve by hand. This means that you use a sieve and a brush or another tool to push the particles through the sieve. This is still a valid and widely used method of sieving.
One problem with this method is that there is a lot of room for human error. By using a sieve shaker to do your sieving for you instead of by hand, you can eliminate a lot of the chance for human error and you will gain repeatability.
Of course, to use a sieve shaker instead of a sieve itself, you are going to be increasing your cost.
When it comes to cost, we think you should find a range that suits your needs. If you are sieving a material like sand that requires a lot of tests per day, you may want to consider a more reliable and speedier method, like a Dynamic Image Analysis System. One of these machines is going to cost quite a bit more than a sieve shaker, but it could be worth the investment for you.
If sieving is not as critical to your process, and you are sieving only once or twice a day, maybe you want to go with just test sieves or a sieve shaker and spend 5-250 dollars for a sieve. A sieve shaker will cost you around $1,730 to $7,600. depending on model and make. This is much more cost effective purchase, but as we said before, it increases your chances of human error and reduces repeatability.
Goto Jiangyin Chenyuan Machinery to know more.
4. Environment
There are a few different concerns that all fall into this category including sound/noise, space, and accessibility.
How much room do I have for a sieve shaker?
There are a lot of sizes of sieve shakers. There are mechanical shakers that go inside of a sound enclosure cabinet which can be as small as 35 wide by 24 deep by 29 high.
There are huge sieve shakers such as a tray shaker, which can be as large as 107 wide by 48 deep by 106 high.
An air jet sieving machine has a relatively small footprint on a tabletop, but you must have room for the vacuum.
If you are looking to get a sieve shaker that will fit into a very small lab, an electromagnetic unit might be your best option.
Will people be working nearby the sieve shaker?
Noise is a factor mostly when it comes to mechanical shakers. Many of the shakers on the market are designed to minimize the noise of the machine. Sound enclosure cabinets are available for most models to further control the inherent operating noise.
To be clear, mechanical sieve shakers like the Ro-Tap are used in labs all over the world. If you are concerned with noise on a mechanical shaker or want to find out more you can check out our article: Reasons My Sieve Shaker is Noisy.
5. Industry Standards
Depending on the material you are looking to analyze, you can probably find an industry standard to advise you on the recommended sieving method.
Sometimes industry standards are required and although we cant tell you what yours are, we can help you figure out where you can look.
ASTM Standards are available for material ranging from coarse aggregates and plastics to pharmaceuticals.
API Standards for sand and ceramic proppants are available for reference as well.
You can also find a wide range of Standards through ANSI.
To Sum It Up
If you take nothing else away from this article we hope that you at least are aware of some of the type so information and choices that you need to be able to select the right solution for your processes.
We also hope that you realized that there are tons of options available to you when it comes to sieve shakers and although it can seem overwhelming, it means you have a good chance of finding the best machine for your particular needs.
Whether you purchase one of our Ro-Tap Sieve Shakers or our Computerized Particle Analyzers, or look elsewhere for your machine, we want you to be an informed buyer.
If you want to explore more information about our Ro-Tap Sieve Shaker you can learn all about it in our article: Everything you need to know about the Ro-Tap sieve shaker.
If you have any other questions about our machines or particle analysis in general, feel free to reach out to us.
Want all the latest industry trends and innovations sent directly to your inbox? Subscribe to our monthly newsletters today!
Ultrasonic Sieve System, Ultrasonic Sieving Machine
Ultrasonic sieving machines have made a significant mark in the world of particle separation. By harnessing the power of ultrasonic frequencies, these machines can sieve and separate particles with precision. However, newer sieving machines like the Hi-Sifter have emerged as technology advances, offering even superior capabilities. This article delves deep into the world of ultrasonic sieving machines, their comparison with the Hi-Sifter, and the advantages of the latter.
What is an Ultrasonic Sieving Machine?
An ultrasonic sieving machine uses ultrasonic frequency to vibrate the screen. This vibration frequency can reach up to 36,000 times per second, allowing fine powder materials to form a micro-suspended state on the screen. This ensures faster passage through the screen without generating static electricity or sticking, making it easier to screen powders.
When Were Ultrasonic Sieving Machines Invented?
Ultrasonic sieve machines, introduced around the s, have remained relatively unchanged in design and function since their inception. While these machines offer a cost-effective entry point, they are often associated with high maintenance and repair costs over their lifespan. In the everchanging powder processing landscape where the demand for more precise particle cuts are required, the Ultrasonic sieve lags behind the more advanced sieving technologies such as the Hi-Sifter.
Hi-Sifter Industrial Sieve vs Ultrasonic Sieving Machine: A Comparative Analysis
As far as advanced sieving equipment technologies, the Hi-Sifter sieving machine stands out as a superior choice compared to its counterpart, the Ultrasonic Sieving Machine. But lets face it, who doesnt like to use the word Ultrasonic, right? Everything that has the word Ultrasonic next to it must mean that its far superior to anything that doesnt have the ultrasonic word attached to it right? Well, lets have a look and compare the two technologies and their capabilities:
Working Principle:
- Hi-Sifter: Employs high-frequency vibration to separate particles. The vibrations efficiently break down agglomerates and allow for precise sieving, 98%+ yields, high throughput rates even when sieving the finest of particles.
- Ultrasonic Sieving Machine: Uses an ultrasonic frequency that sends a pulse onto the screen surface, aiming to prevent screen clogging and facilitate particle separation.
Sieving Efficiency & Capabilities:
- Hi-Sifter: Known for its exceptional sieving efficiency, especially with ultra-fine powders. It can sieve particles as fine as 10um efficiently. In some instances, such as wet sieving, it can efficiently separate particles down to as fine as 5um. Moreover, the Hi-Sifter screen mesh does not blind, ensuring consistent performance throughout the entire screening process.
- Ultrasonic Sieving Machine: It offers decent sieving capabilities but can only sieve down to around 74um efficiently. Below these sizes, it has been said that Ultrasonics cannot make efficient separations over a prolonged period of time.
Applications:
- Hi-Sifter: Ideal for pharmaceuticals, food products, and other fine powders that tend to agglomerate and blind screen mesh of other screening machines. Its superior sieving capabilities make it a preferred choice for industries requiring precision. This is especially true for very dense metal powders, this is where the high acceleration energy of the Hi-Sifter really shines.
- Ultrasonic Sieving Machine: Suitable for a range of materials but might not be the best choice for ultra-fine powders.
Maintenance & Screen Changes:
- Hi-Sifter: One of the Hi-Sifters standout features is the ease of screen changes. It takes a mere 15 minutes, and operators can perform this task themselves. This quick changeover ensures minimal downtime between screen size changes.
- Ultrasonic Sieving Machine: Screen changes are a significant drawback. Screens often need to be sent back for redoing, which can be costly and time-consuming. According to some estimates, this can run anywhere from $2,000.00 to over $6,000.00 USD. Not only that but this process can leave a plant non-operational for weeks, leading to significant revenue losses.
Integration:
- Hi-Sifter: As a standalone unit, it can be seamlessly integrated into production lines, offering flexibility and efficiency.
- Ultrasonic Sieving Machine: While it can be integrated into new or existing sieving machines, it might not offer the same level of flexibility or efficiency as the Hi-Sifter.
Cost & Downtime:
- Hi-Sifter: Although it might have a higher initial investment, the reduced need for maintenance, quick screen changes, and superior sieving capabilities can offset the cost over time.
- Ultrasonic Sieving Machine: The additional costs associated with screen maintenance, coupled with potential downtimes, can make it a less economical choice in the long run.
What Are Some Common Issues People Face While Using Ultrasonic Sieving Machine?
Ultrasonic sieve systems have been a breakthrough in the particle separation industry, offering enhanced sieving capabilities. However, like all technologies, they come with their set of challenges. Considering this, here are several issues that come to the forefront from people that utilize this technology or plan to one day use this technology in their manufacturing process:
- Screen Maintenance: One of the primary concerns with ultrasonic sieving machines is the need for frequent screen maintenance. Screens often need to be sent back for redoing, which can be both costly and time-consuming.
- Downtime: The process of sending screens for maintenance can leave a plant non-operational for extended periods, leading to revenue losses.
- Sieving Efficiency: While ultrasonic sieving machines can sieve down to around 74um efficiently, they might struggle with ultra-fine powders, especially when compared to advanced technologies like the Hi-Sifter.
- Cost Implications: The initial investment for an ultrasonic sieving machine might be significantly less, however, the additional costs associated with screen maintenance and potential downtimes makes it much less economical in the long run.
- Integration Challenges: While these machines can be integrated into new or existing sieving setups, they might not offer the same level of flexibility or efficiency as some of the newer sieving technologies available in the market.
- Static Electricity and Sticking: Even though ultrasonic frequencies aim to prevent screen clogging, in some cases, fine powder materials might still generate static electricity or stick, and cause screen mesh blinding which hinders the throughput rates and sieving process over an extended period of time. The main issue that ultrasonic sieve machines face when it comes to blinding is that material is put onto the screen surface and it sits on the mesh while the ultrasonic pulse is activated. The mere act of the material sitting on the screen mesh causes the screen to blind. This is one of the key aspects of the Hi-Sifter that separates it from the Ultrasonic technology because the materials are never sitting on the screen surface which eliminates blinding all together and improves performance.
While ultrasonic sieving machines have revolutionized particle separation, the emergence of the Hi-Sifter has set a new benchmark in the powder screening industry. Its ability to sieve ultra-fine particles, combined with quick screen changes and reduced downtime, makes it an invaluable asset for industries seeking precision and efficiency. As technology continues to evolve, its essential for industries to stay updated and choose the equipment that offers the best return on investment and performance.
Want more information on powder sieving equipment? Feel free to contact us.