structural factors of safety (help a mechanical guy out)

22 Jul.,2024

 

structural factors of safety (help a mechanical guy out)

INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

View Details

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!

  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
Join Us!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving . By joining you are opting in to receive .

Posting Guidelines



Students Click Here

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Eng-Tips Posting Policies

Contact US

thread507- Forum Search FAQs Links MVPs
  • Forum

  • Search

  • FAQs

  • Links

  • MVPs

structural factors of safety (help a mechanical guy out)

structural factors of safety (help a mechanical guy out)

keyen

(Mechanical)

(OP)

5 Dec 14 23:01

Please note, I'm not designing any buildings, just some simple structures for our fabrication yard.

thanks

Hi, I'm a mechanical engineer, but every now and then I'm tasked with something that's more structural in nature. I've trying to figure what kind of factors of safety are used in structural designs, and I'd like to double check what I've found with some of you. According to ANSI/AISC 360-10 paragraph F1, the factor of safety for members in flexure is only 1.67. This seems low to me (based on my pressure vessel experience). This random site indicates 4-6 is acceptable: http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/factors-safety-fos-d_.html . Am I missing something, or are steel structures built to a factor of safety (for flexure) as low as 1.67?Please note, I'm not designing any buildings, just some simple structures for our fabrication yard.thanks

RE: structural factors of safety (help a mechanical guy out)

JAE

(Structural)

5 Dec 14 23:10
For buildings the general safety factors aren't quite that high.

For Allowable Strength Design the AISC Specification provides for safety using the Ωo factor for flexure at 1.67 as you indicated.

This means that the allowable stress in a steel member would be reduced by the factor 1.67 on its yield.
So the SF does = 1.67.

AISC also provides a separate load factor design method where safety factors are divided between the loads and the strength.
This has the advantage of responding to the variations in loads and the variations in strength.

The anticipated strength of the member is reduced by a φ factor (usually 0.9 to 0.75) to account for the variations and possible inadequacies of estimating the strength of the members.
The applied loads are factored up to account for the variability of the loads - 1.2 for "dead" loads and 1.6 for "live" loads as an example.

So if the average load factor is about 1.5, and the φ factor is 0.9, your overall safety factor is 1.67, very near the ASD method.

The higher factors you see on that link are perhaps there for more dynamic loads, or for more dangerous loads (pressure vessels exploding) where life safety risks are much higher?
I don't deal in pressure vessels so can't say for certain.

I think your link is screwed up a bit on the building design aspect.For buildings the general safety factors aren't quite that high.For Allowable Strength Design the AISC Specification provides for safety using the Ωo factor for flexure at 1.67 as you indicated.This means that the allowable stress in a steel member would be reduced by the factor 1.67 on its yield.So the SF does = 1.67.AISC also provides a separate load factor design method where safety factors are divided between the loads and the strength.This has the advantage of responding to the variations in loads and the variations in strength.The anticipated strength of the member is reduced by a φ factor (usually 0.9 to 0.75) to account for the variations and possible inadequacies of estimating the strength of the members.The applied loads are factored up to account for the variability of the loads - 1.2 for "dead" loads and 1.6 for "live" loads as an example.So if the average load factor is about 1.5, and the φ factor is 0.9, your overall safety factor is 1.67, very near the ASD method.The higher factors you see on that link are perhaps there for more dynamic loads, or for more dangerous loads (pressure vessels exploding) where life safety risks are much higher?I don't deal in pressure vessels so can't say for certain.

Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: structural factors of safety (help a mechanical guy out)

keyen

(Mechanical)

(OP)

5 Dec 14 23:23

I have a follow up questions: if you were designing supports like the ones shown below or a large pipe rack like in the second pic, what would be a suitable design code? AISC 360 doesn't seem appropriate. Let's assume the pipe codes do not specify any of the structural needs.



JAE, thanks for the very quick reply. What you've said confirms what I've been reading. Thanks.I have a follow up questions: if you were designing supports like the ones shown below or a large pipe rack like in the second pic, what would be a suitable design code? AISC 360 doesn't seem appropriate. Let's assume the pipe codes do not specify any of the structural needs.

RE: structural factors of safety (help a mechanical guy out)

TehMightyEngineer

(Structural)

5 Dec 14 23:28

For industrial design (which you probably do if you do pressure vessels) then you'll be happy to know that most people do not design industrial building structures to the minimum safety factor most of the time, though flexure usually is right to the limit even in industrial design. I'll often see simple structures with safety factors of 2 or 3 in industrial settings.

It's worth noting that monorails and cranes (above the hook items) are also given similar low safety factors. Not all 1.67 necessarily, you'll probably see a lot of 2.0 safety factors. It depends on the service class of the crane.

Yep, 1.67 is the typical safety factor for flexure, tension yielding, and compression. Connections are usually higher at 1.75 to 2.0 (excepting shear yielding which is 1.5). Building design takes a lot of things right to edge and there is little room for engineering error.For industrial design (which you probably do if you do pressure vessels) then you'll be happy to know that most people do not design industrial building structures to the minimum safety factor most of the time, though flexure usually is right to the limit even in industrial design. I'll often see simple structures with safety factors of 2 or 3 in industrial settings.It's worth noting that monorails and cranes (above the hook items) are also given similar low safety factors. Not all 1.67 necessarily, you'll probably see a lot of 2.0 safety factors. It depends on the service class of the crane.

Maine EIT, Civil/Structural.

RE: structural factors of safety (help a mechanical guy out)

TehMightyEngineer

(Structural)

5 Dec 14 23:34

For the pipe bridge you've shown I would absolutely use AISC 360 and it is included in AISC 360's scope. See A1 in the specification, you'll see that it covers not only buildings but structures of steel "designed, fabricated, and erected in a manner similar to buildings, with building-like vertical and lateral load resisting elements."

As far as pipe supports you can use AISC 360 easily enough. Steel is steel and it's not going to care what code you use, it will fail when it's capacity is exceeded.For the pipe bridge you've shown I would absolutely use AISC 360 and it is included in AISC 360's scope. See A1 in the specification, you'll see that it covers not only buildings but structures of steel "designed, fabricated, and erected in a manner similar to buildings, with building-like vertical and lateral load resisting elements."

Maine EIT, Civil/Structural.

RE: structural factors of safety (help a mechanical guy out)

dhengr

(Structural)

6 Dec 14 00:52

Keyen:
Why not ask your boss what safety factors and standards you should be following for this work? Most industries and types of equipment have some stds. and norms that they follow for their specific design. In your case various ASME piping stds. would be a good place to start looking. Much of this type of design work takes a Mechanical Engineering tack on the problem. The break point or separation point/level is that the pipe carrying the fluid, the pressure vessel containing the fluid/process is designed under one code and to a higher std., and then almost everything else (outside of the outer skin) is designed under another code or code division and to a lower FoS. Contracts with clients/customers, construction documents and specs. usually call out the codes and stds. to be followed. As mentioned above AISC 360 doesn&#;t really cover your kind of design or product, but it is still a good guide to follow for steel design as regards the basic Engineering Mechanics of the various Structural Design aspects of your problem, if you can only wade through the complexities that have been introduced in the last few editions. Because of these newer added complexities it has become more difficult to use AISC 360 as a design guide for anything other than bldgs., you just can&#;t find the basic design concept or mechanical concepts for all the extraneous b.s. You might be as well off to go back to your Engineering Mechanics, Strength of Materials and Machine/Product Design textbooks for your basic guidance.

With competitive price and timely delivery, Yunsheng sincerely hope to be your supplier and partner.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.


Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Custom Steel Services Guide

Steel is renowned worldwide for its exceptional versatility and malleability, making it an ideal choice for a wide range of customized applications. Through the interaction of various constituents, such as allotropes and alloying elements like carbon, steel exhibits a remarkable array of properties, rendering it invaluable across numerous industries. The role of a fabricator entails harnessing the malleability and ductility of steel to transform basic sections into diverse shapes and structures.

If you are looking for custom metal fabrication in Sydney, look no further than Steel Fabrication Services. We are experts in complete, cost-effective custom steel solutions with a flexible approach and a highly skilled and experienced team.

If you&#;re in need of quality custom metal in Sydney, get in touch with Steel Fabrication Services today. We will provide custom solutions at very competitive price.

Who Needs Custom Steel?

Custom steel is required by any industry that uses specialised steel products. Apart from playing a vital role in the commercial construction industry, fabricators also work closely with shipbuilding, mining and auto-manufacturing industries, as well as product manufacturers. Fabricators also work directly with consumers for specialised private projects.

What Are the Benefits of Custom Steel?

Apart from being designed specifically to meet your needs, in most cases, custom-made steel is more durable than prefabricated metal parts because they use higher quality materials. Custom metal fabrications often pay for themselves by limiting part replacements over the lifespan of the product.

Types of Custom Steel

Steel fabricators manufacture an array of custom products for a huge range of industry needs. Some common types of custom steel include:

  • Universal beams
  • Universal columns
  • Bar joists
  • Platforms
  • Ladders
  • Pipe racks
  • Frames
  • Trusses
  • Beams
  • Grating
  • Skids
  • Steel stairs
  • Stair balustrades
  • Brackets
  • Steel enclosures
  • Steel cabinets
  • Stringers
  • Walkways
  • Platform
  • Handrails
  • Fencing
  • Decking
  • Mezzanines
  • Kickass Proxy and more

What Do Custom Steel Fabricators Do?

Steel fabricators use a number of techniques to transform basic steel sections into custom shapes, ready for use in building and the manufacturing. They work closely alongside architects, steel drafters and detailers, consumers and manufacturers to bring plans on a piece of paper to life.

Modern steel fabrication utilises high-tech computer software such Computer Numerical Control (CNC) systems that monitor and control the movement of machines such as routers, welders and laser cutters, while 3D modelling has made it easy to visualise even the most complex components. This means that fabricators can manufacture very high quality custom steel products with absolute precision. It also means that steel products arrive in order and ready to install.

If you&#;re need of quality, personalised metal fabrication, please don&#;t hesitate to get in touch today!

With over a decade of experience, we have earned a reputation of offering complete, cost effective steel fabrication solutions with competitive rates, builders trade prices and fast turnarounds, and pride ourselves on being one of the most experienced steel fabricators in Sydney.

Organise your custom metal fabrication with Steel Fabrication Services

Our team of expert structural steel fabricators have the experience and knowledge to answer any of your questions and will ensure that you find the best solution to suit your needs. To contact us today, simply call, fax,  or drop by our Brookvale location.

While you&#;re here, read more about the benefits of steel fabrication:

 

https://steelfabservices.com.au/steel-fencing-fab/

 

https://steelfabservices.com.au/what-you-need-to-know-about-custom-steel/

 

https://steelfabservices.com.au/3-reasons-why-you-should-get-a-steel-fabrication-quote-from-us/

 

If you are looking for more details, kindly visit Custom Structural Steel.